[EM] Poll on voting-systems, to inform voters in upcoming enactment-elections

[Michael Ossipoff]

In one sentence I accidentally touched the wrong key, & wrote “12th” when I
meant 11th.

The nomination period ended, & the voting period started, at 5:14:59 GMT,
April 11th.

On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 00:37 Michael Ossipoff <email9648742 at gmail.com>
wrote:

>
>
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 23:45 Chris Benham <cbenhamau at yahoo.com.au> wrote:
>
>>
>> Have the nominations closed?
>
>
> Yes, at 5:14:59 GMT, April 12th.
>
>
> Not that I want to nominate another method.
>>
>> There has been very little electioneering, with I think most of the
>> nominated methods not even being mentioned.
>>
>
> Yes, we weren’t given any information on most of the nominees. People
> should have told the advantages/merits of their nominees.
>
>>
>> Some haven't even been explained let alone discussed or promoted.
>
>
> Exactly. That’s why I ranked most of them all together at the same
> rank-position. The ones I know about & like ranked in order of merit, then
> the ones that I don’t know equal-ranked, & then, below them, the ones I
> know that I don’t like. Pluraity was at bottom, as everyone agrees, & so
> there was no reason to rank it.
>
>>
>>
>> When does voting close?
>>
>
> It closed at 5:14:59 GMT, April 11th. The moment nominations ended, the
> voting-period started. I voted about 1 minute after the start of the voting
> period.
>
> But, I initially specified a month-long voting period. If that’s too long
> people can move to shorten it. But the long voting period could allow some
> time for explanation of methods & their special merits.
>
> Shall we say that votes can be changed throughout the month-long
> voting-period? If anyone moves to shorten it, we could discuss that. If it
> were moved (& seconded?), then maybe people would like to choose the
> duration that is the median of the voted suggestions.
>
> But given the absence of explanation & advocacy for the unfamiliar
> methods, maybe the month-long voting-period is a good thing.
>
> My duration specifications were meant as default suggestions, changeable
> by moving for a vote. …at any time, of course.
>
>>
>> Chris Benham
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/attachments/20240411/3806695d/attachment-0001.htm>