[EM] Consdervation of information
voting at ukscientists.com
Thu Jan 26 10:10:04 PST 2023
Yes, Kevin, an improvement on Borda, in that respect.
On 24/01/2023 07:46, Kevin Venzke wrote:
> Hi Richard,
> I'm not quite sure what you're saying below, but the Later-no-harm criterion is an argument *for* traditional STV, not against it.
> Le lundi 23 janvier 2023 à 14:51:20 UTC−6, Richard Lung <voting at ukscientists.com> a écrit :
> “The possibility of later harm,” alleged of parents, is an argument used by social services, in Britain, to excuse forced adoptions. It cannot be disproved. It is a superstition and persecution, incapable of scientific disproof, unworthy of a modern knowledge-based society. Likewise, a similar unproven and unprovable excuse against the use of STV, made, by a career party, in the Plant report, citing Riker, without demonstration, that stv is "chaotic."
More information about the Election-Methods