[EM] Hay guys, look at this...

[KenB]

On 2/17/2023 10:48 AM, robert bristow-johnson wrote:
>>   https://drive.google.com/file/d/1qnSE5wPa1y7k-Y_zblLRwxc2Ol1QmrUs/view?usp=share_link
> ______________________________
>
> (d)(1) Additional tabulation. Upon tabulation of the ballots, if no candidate receives a majority of first-ranked preferences, the ballots shall be tabulated again by paired comparison and examining every possible paired comparison. In each paired comparison, the presiding officer shall note the winning candidate in each paired comparison or if there is instead a tie.
> (2) Condorcet winner. If a candidate is the winning candidate in every
> paired comparison, the candidate shall be declared the winner of the election.
> (3) No Condorcet winner. If there is no candidate that is the winning candidate in every paired comparison, then the candidate having the plurality of first-ranking preferences is declared the winner.
> ______________________________
= = = = =
[KB]  Do I understand paragraph (3) correctly: If there's no Condorcet 
winner, then you default to a First Past the Post winner?

   - Ken Bearman, Minneapolis MN
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/attachments/20230217/b685d862/attachment.htm>