[EM] Notes on a few Later-no-harm methods

[Richard Lung]

Thank you, Kristofer,

I refer you to the post as a whole, not just the first couple of lines, 
for my answer.

It's not just a matter of "shut up and calculate" to quote a famous 
grouse of hapless quantum theory students.

(You make me suspect you are an instructor. However, I appreciate your 
consideration and competance.)

Regards,

Richard Lung.


On 16/05/2022 10:13, Kristofer Munsterhjelm wrote:
> On 16.05.2022 08:20, Richard Lung wrote:
>>
>> Binomial STV is later no harm, unlike Borda count, because uses keep
>> values , equivalent to Gregory method, for both election and exclusion
>> counts.
> I would like to check that for myself. That's why I've asked (three
> times) if you could give me the concrete keep and exclude values, and
> the winners, for particular example elections involving truncation.
>
> Could you please do that?
>
> -km