[EM] Monotone method inspiration approach?
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
km_elmet at t-online.de
Tue Jan 18 01:29:10 PST 2022
On 18.01.2022 01:57, Daniel Carrera wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 4:40 PM Kristofer Munsterhjelm
> <km_elmet at t-online.de <mailto:km_elmet at t-online.de>> wrote:
>
>> These if-then clauses may be difficult to put into mathematical
>> expression form, but I found this (which may seem a bit ugly at first):
>> f(A) = g(H(fpA - fpC) * H(fpB-fpC) * A>B,
>> H(fpA - fpB) * H(fpC-fpB) * A>C)
>>
>> where H is the step function H(x) = 1 if x > 0, 0 otherwise,
>
>
> Btw, if you want to make a plot of that, I recommend you replace the
> Heavyside function with one that is equal to 0.5 when x is exactly 0.
> Otherwise, when fpB == fpC you'll see f(A) suddenly crash to 0 for no
> apparent reason and you'll be left scratching your head.
That's deliberately left unspecified because when fpB == fpC, that means
that two candidates tie for last, and then IRV's in big trouble. I
*think* using second preferences to break the tie would then work, but
as this situation is measure zero I didn't want to further complicate my
expression by including it.
In practice, this tie dependence can further amplify IRV's chaotic
behavior. Warren calls it "near-tie nightmares".
-km
More information about the Election-Methods
mailing list