[EM] Quick and Clean Burial Resistant Smith, compromise

[Kristofer Munsterhjelm]

On 14.01.2022 12:45, Daniel Carrera wrote:

> As in my last email, the "trivial", "reverse", and "moderate" columns
> are the fraction of strategy successes that were attributed to each
> strategy. I think the result is really interesting:
> 
> 1) If an election is susceptible to strategy, 88-98% of the time the
> trivial strategy will work.
> 
> 2) Out of the remaining strategy successes, 90-95% are attributed to the
> "reverse" / "poor man's social order" strategy.

Nice! I agree, that is interesting. Benham is known for being pretty
resistant to strategy in general, so I'm wondering if that strategy
resistance forces the remaining weakness to be concentrated around easy
strategies.

Could you try a method from each of the two other categories, and see if
the trivial strategy is so overwhelmingly succcessful on these too?

E.g. Smith//Plurality (Or Smith,Plurality) from the extremely easy to
manipulate category, and Minmax from the intermediate-to-high one.

-km