[EM] “Monotonic” Binomial STV

[Kristofer Munsterhjelm]

On 26.02.2022 15:02, Kristofer Munsterhjelm wrote:
> On 26.02.2022 13:21, Richard Lung wrote:
>>
>> Thank you, Forest,
>>
>> Your example is the kind of example that Riker gave.
> 
> Thank you for providing information about how to calculate who wins
> according to Binomial STV.
> 
> I have a few examples of my own. Could you tell me who wins, and how the
> wins are calculated, for these single-winner elections?
> 
> First:
> 
> 51: A>B>C
> 48: B>A>C
>  1: B>C>A
> 
> And second:
> 
> 36: A>B>C
> 34: B>C>A
> 30: C>A>B

Oops, I probably should've noticed that Forest's example is a variant of
my second election, so I don't think I need the outcome and calculations
for that one to verify whether the way I think the method works (for
three candidates) is right.

The first one would still be useful, though :-)

-km