[EM] Can anyone help with straight-ahead Condorcet language?

[Kristofer Munsterhjelm]

On 9/21/21 8:07 PM, Daniel Carrera wrote:
> You can just say "by the most ballots". If you really want to push it, 
> then "by the greatest number of ballots".
> 
> On an unrelated note, there is a Copeland-like version that is (I 
> think) Smith efficient:

[snip]

That's right, because the Copeland set is a subset of the Smith set 
(actually, even a subset of the uncovered set), so choosing a candidate 
from that set must be Smith-efficient.

However, every Copeland method of this form fails clone independence 
because the Copeland set as a whole fails it. (It might also be the 
case, though implausible, that there are multiple candidates with the 
same number of first preferences, or even with zero).

-km