[EM] Condorcet-Kemeny clarifications

[Kristofer Munsterhjelm]

On 10/29/21 8:09 PM, Richard, the VoteFair guy wrote:

>  > (2) it fails clone independence,
> 
> It has a nice balance between clone independence and independence of 
> irrelevant alternatives.  "Fails" just means the failure rates are not 
> zero.

I'd rather pick a Condorcet method with Condorcet methods' IIA 
resilience (when there is a CW) *and* full clone independence, than one 
with the former but not the latter. :-)

Since that option is available, I mean.

-km