[EM] Single/Multimember districts (was Re: In defence of IRV)
km_elmet at t-online.de
Thu Nov 18 06:12:26 PST 2021
On 16.11.2021 15:52, robert bristow-johnson wrote:
> Unfortunately it's top-two vote getters. Each voter has two votes.
That's not a particularly good method, no; but if you succeed getting
BTR-IRV enacted, and you decide to advocate for replacing the top-two
method with STV, you could use the BTR version.
Every STV variant with the same surplus election mechanism passes Droop
proportionality, so modifying the elimination mechanism (like BTR-IRV
does) won't make it fail Droop. So getting BTR-IRV passed shouldn't
hinder future adoption of STV.
I don't know if replacing the top-two method with STV is feasible,
though, as I don't know enough about Vermont politics.
More information about the Election-Methods