[EM] Tideman sort tie-breaker proposal

Monkey Puzzle araucaria.araucana at gmail.com
Mon Jul 3 10:54:41 PDT 2017


I like it.  It's clean and logical.

Regarding the 2nd level tie-breaker:  looks like you're using a
median-rating type of method there?  What about Majority Judgment?


 Frango ut patefaciam -- I break so that I may reveal

On Sat, Jul 1, 2017 at 2:44 PM, Lucas Dailey <lucasdailey at gmail.com> wrote:

> I’m working with some talented software developers to build an open
> source, multi-winner  implementation of Ranked Pair/Tideman tailored toward
> budgeting to enable legislators to collectively and fairly rank their
> budget priorities to arrive at a democratic budget. As a former municipal
> legislator (Madison, WI) I discovered first-hand how dramatically typical
> budgeting processes can distort budgets and cause worthy initiatives to go
> unfunded.
>
>
>
> While building our open source software we quickly discovered the sort tie
> problem. I prefer Tideman/RP for public elections because it’s relatively
> conceptually simple compared to its criterion-meeting peers (I’m still a
> fan, Markus Schulze!). I can explain it to voters and politicians. However
> none of the Tideman tie-breaking procedures I’ve heard of meet that same
> criterion of explainability and grounding in democracy.
>
>
>
> I have a procedure that I believe meets those criteria, which I paraphrase
> as the “Lost worst: locked-in first” procedure. I like it, and I’d love to
> get feedback on it. I also imagine others have thought of it before so any
> research that’s been done would be helpful. Also the procedure wouldn’t
> work in every scenario so I proposed a secondary procedure that is less
> inspiring but still better than many alternatives (and also unlikely to
> work in every scenario).
>
>
>
> We’re working to have the software ready in the next couple months, so any
> feedback now would be greatly appreciated. And of course if anyone wants to
> contribute to the project we’re happy to work with other developers,
> designers, and mathematicians.
>
>
>
> Here’s a quick deck explaining the procedure: https://docs.google.com/
> presentation/d/1K6VWjMwscspFKRzc2h6YWfWEkqdnQ
> gcLVyVXdTsEbkE/edit#slide=id.p
>
>
>
> Thanks in advance for your feedback!
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Lucas
>
> --
> Lucas Dailey
> blog: medium.com/@lucasdailey
> work: Product Manager | PropellerHealth.com <http://propellerhealth.com/>
>
> ----
> Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/attachments/20170703/5849c18d/attachment.htm>


More information about the Election-Methods mailing list