[EM] Crowding' was left out of your fine summary of methods
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
km_elmet at t-online.de
Tue Sep 22 11:24:25 PDT 2015
On 09/22/2015 12:48 AM, steve bosworth wrote:
> 'Crowding' was left out of your fine summary of methods:
> http://miroirs.ironie.org/condorcet/condorcet.org/emr/defn.shtml#compromising
That's strange since the methods list (
http://miroirs.ironie.org/condorcet/condorcet.org/emr/methods.shtml )
refers to crowding. I guess the admin (Blake Cretney?) forgot to add the
term to the glossary.
If you're wondering what crowding is, it is a clone failure that doesn't
harm nor help the candidate that is being cloned. For instance, the
winner might be B, then after you clone A, the winner changes to C.
The Wikipedia article on the independence of clones criterion shows
several examples of clone failure:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Independence_of_clones_criterion, such as
a crowding failure example for Copeland's method.
More information about the Election-Methods
mailing list