[EM] General PR question (from Andy Jennings in 2011)

[Toby Pereira]

From: Richard Fobes <ElectionMethods at VoteFair.org>
>To: election-methods at lists.electorama.com 
>Sent: Tuesday, 30 September 2014, 19:30
>Subject: Re: [EM] General PR question (from Andy Jennings in 2011)
> 
>
>On 9/30/2014 10:22 AM, Kathy Dopp wrote:
>
>
>
>
>> On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 10:41 PM, Toby Pereira<tdp201b at yahoo.co.uk>  wrote:
>> ...
>>> In that case take the following example:
>>>
>>> 4 to elect, proportional representation, approval voting
>>>
>>> 10 voters: A
>>> 10 voters: B
>>> 10 voters: C
>>> 9 voters: D
>>> 1 voter: D, E
>>>
>>> I declare the winning set of candidates to be ABCE.
>>>
>>
>> I declare it to be ABCD, because 10 voters support D, only 1 supports
>> E so that a larger number of voters would achieve your calculated
>> measure of representation.
>
>I agree with Kathy.  ABCD would be much, much fairer.
>
>----
>Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/emfor list info
>
>
>
>
Of course, it would be. I was just being facetious really.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/attachments/20140930/7c01c5ba/attachment-0001.htm>