[EM] General PR question (from Andy Jennings in 2011)

[Toby Pereira]

From: Kathy Dopp <kathy.dopp at gmail.com>


>Yes. I see.  Do you think these three results *should* be equally
>proportional according to your measure?

>With nonoverlapping support:

># voters,  winning candidate set
>150, 1
>50,  1
>50,  0

>150,  2
>50,    0
>50,    0

>150, 1
>50,  0
>50,  1

>All three candidate sets for two winners for this scenario get the
>same value of your measure:  0.021462585

Yes. That's exactly how I would want a system to behave. Would you agree?

Toby
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/attachments/20141009/7e96b356/attachment.htm>