[EM] Canadian politician supports "a preferential ballot, or a ranked ballot"
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
km_elmet at lavabit.com
Sun Jan 20 00:42:36 PST 2013
On 01/18/2013 05:18 PM, Jameson Quinn wrote:
>
>
> 2013/1/18 Kristofer Munsterhjelm <km_elmet at lavabit.com
> <mailto:km_elmet at lavabit.com>>
>
> On 01/17/2013 06:07 PM, Richard Fobes wrote:
>
> Soon enough, just as has happened in Aspen (CO) and Burlington
> (VT), the
> weaknesses of IRV counting will get exposed. In the meantime, just
> getting people to talk about, and think about, the possibility
> of better
> ballots and better counting methods is a wonderful development.
>
>
> I just hope that won't lead to a false confusion of IRV with ranked
> balloting itself and thus thoughts that ranked balloting can't work
> because IRV blows up spectacularly in an n-way race with n > 2.
>
>
> I'd say it works until n>=2.5, but yes, you're right in general.
Yeah, I was thinking of n integer.
More information about the Election-Methods
mailing list