[EM] My brief MMV definition, without any order-ambiguity

[Michael Ossipoff]

Markus--

In your example below,  with no equal defeats, every Ranked-Pairs
version chooses A.

In that example, Beatpath/CSSD gives the same result as RP.

Of greatest interest would be examples in which RP and Beatpath/CSSD
choose differently. How do their different rules result in the RP
winner usually being publicly preferred to the Beatpath/CSSD winner?

Michael Ossipoff


>
> example:
>
>    Suppose the defeats are (sorted from the strongest to the weakest):
>
>    D > B
>
>    C > B
>
>    A > C
>
>    B > A
>
>    C > D
>
>    D > A
>
> Who is elected in this example by your latest MMV definition?
>
> Markus Schulze
>
> ----
> Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info