[EM] Correction

[Michael Ossipoff]

I said:

> "But real 0-info, at top-end, is unlikely. Without it, in any kind of
> Condorcet or IRV, you won't know what to do. That's a good argument
> for Approval and Score."


Actually, if it's a u/a election, as of course all of our offical
public elections are, then with Approval, Score, ICT and Symmetrical
ICT, you _will_ know what to do:

Approve, top-rate, or top-rank all of the acceptables.

But with TUC, you won't know what to do.

ICT and Symmetrical ICT are Condorcet methods, and so my statement
that I quoted above wasn't correct.

Mike Ossipoff