[EM] Rarity, FBC, Condorcet, comparison of criteria

Jameson Quinn jameson.quinn at gmail.com
Tue May 8 09:39:46 PDT 2012


>
>
> Mike, if you really want to elevate FBC above the Condorcet criterion, I
> suggest that you start by noticing that it is the only voting criterion in
> the Wikipedia comparison table that does not link to a Wikipedia article
> about the criterion (and such a link is also missing from the text section
> just above the table).  I'll let other election-method experts debate with
> you on Wikipedia if you choose to add a Wikipedia article about FBC.


It seems that this is no longer the case. Generally speaking, argument by
authority is weak, but it's even weaker if the authority in question is
Wikipedia, because WP can change without warning.

Jameson
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/attachments/20120508/94e9beca/attachment-0002.htm>


More information about the Election-Methods mailing list