[EM] Kevin: My failure scenario was erroneous for ABucklin
stepjak at yahoo.fr
Sat Mar 3 12:58:58 PST 2012
De : Jameson Quinn <jameson.quinn at gmail.com>
>À : MIKE OSSIPOFF <nkklrp at hotmail.com>
>Cc : election-methods at electorama.com
>Envoyé le : Vendredi 2 mars 2012 13h13
>Objet : Re: [EM] Kevin: My failure scenario was erroneous for ABucklin
>Also, since ABucklin is in all significant regards identical to MJ, Balinski and Laraki's proof that MJ meets FBC works verbatim for ABucklin.
Did they use a special term for this property?
We used to have an FBC page on Wikipedia, based on content from Russ' site I believe, but eventually this
was removed since the notability is unclear.
The big difference between ABucklin and MJ is that in the former, raising and lowering a candidate can alter
the stage at which other candidates attain majority.
It occurred to me that it could happen that if you change
This could probably move the win from B to C or E. But then you could just top-rank B to prevent it.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Election-Methods