[EM] Simpler, obvious, easily-used FBC, directly describing the relevant basic property

[Jameson Quinn]

Is this essentially equivalent to the normal statement of FBC? Or is it
meaningfully stronger in some way? (Obviously, it's "weaker" because it
doesn't talk about the situation where the only way to make A win is to
vote nobody at the top at all; but that's a silly case that will never
matter for a real voting system.)

Jameson

2012/7/28 Michael Ossipoff <email9648742 at gmail.com>

> FBC7:
>
> Moving a candidate to top on your ballot shouldn't give the/a win to
> someone not at top on your ballot.
>
> (A candidate is at top on your ballot if you don't vote anyone over hir)
>
> [end of FBC7 definition
>
> That FBC definition is so obvious that it has probably been suggested
> before.
>
> Approval and ICT meet FBC7. Ordinary (un-improved) Condorcet fails
> FBC7 (and every FBC).
>
> Mike Ossipoff
>
>
>
> ]
> ----
> Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/attachments/20120728/44cae421/attachment-0004.htm>