[EM] Answers regarding claim about Approval's enact-ability

[Richard Fobes]

Mike,

I'm not sure what you are saying about your signature on the Declaration.

As a clarification, the original document at Google Docs needs an email 
address as part of the signature.  The copy of the Declaration at 
www.BanSingleMarkBallots.org omits the email addresses.

Because I seem to be acting in a secretarial role regarding signatures, 
I have less time to answer every question that is asked in this forum. 
I'm still trying to find time to reply to earlier questions asked by 
Jameson and Kristofer.  They have been patiently waiting.

As should be clear from my posts, I have put Declaration-related matters 
to the top of my priority list (including your signature requests!), and 
that pushes other forum-related topics down on my list of priorities 
(but it does not push them off the list).

Collaboration requires respect, and patience.

Richard Fobes


On 4/13/2012 10:57 AM, Michael Ossipoff wrote:
> Richard--
>
> No one can fault you for being busy.
>
> But, I would just humbly suggest that, if you're too busy to support a
> statement that you make,
> it would be great if you could also be too busy to _make_ the statement.
>
> Remember that the EM guidelines ask that we be prepared to support our
> statements.
>
> Mike Ossipoff
>
>
> P.S.
>
> I'm sorry--I didn't mean to imply that I request my e-mail address to be
> in my signature. I've noticed
> that none of the other signatures contain an e-mail address. When I
> found my e-mail address in the suggested short-version,
> I left it in my own improved short version, thinking that it must be a
> standard feature that I hadn't noticed
> present in the others. Then I noticed that it isn't in the others.
> Removing my e-mail address would make
> my signature more in line with the others, in addition to improving its
> brevity.
>