[EM] A design flaw in the electoral system
Fred Gohlke
fredgohlke at verizon.net
Tue Oct 4 06:26:25 PDT 2011
Good Morning, Michael
I am not entirely clear on the flow of logic in your abstract, but I get
the sense that you're saying voters should be able to cast their vote
and have it, too ...
Voters are not pieces of cake. The act of voting does not
remove their needs and desires from the political system.
They should be able to continue to influence the political
process after they've voted.
If that understanding of your paper is incorrect, I must improve my
understanding before I can comment more intelligently.
At the risk of digressing, I'd like to suggest that the 'Design Flaw in
the Electoral System' is a step further back. The flaw is in the
assumption that the right to vote, by itself, makes a system free and
democratic.
That assumption is the root of the failure of our political system.
If I am offered options that affect my life, options that I've had no
voice in defining, the ability to choose one of them is neither free nor
democratic. On the contrary, it expresses my status as a subject of
those who defined the options. The right to vote in such circumstances
is a farce.
This is not to say voting is unimportant, it is to say that formation of
the options on which we vote is more important.
Fred Gohlke
More information about the Election-Methods
mailing list