[EM] Median-based Proportional Representation
Toby Pereira
tdp201b at yahoo.co.uk
Sat Jul 9 03:45:03 PDT 2011
Just to clarify this, for the nth "permeantile", I think you'd weight each point
on the n side (100-n)^2 and on the (100-n) side it would be n^2 .
________________________________
From: Toby Pereira <tdp201b at yahoo.co.uk>
To: electorama list <election-methods at lists.electorama.com>
Sent: Sat, 9 July, 2011 0:19:30
Subject: [EM] Median-based Proportional Representation
*I was thinking about how you would calculate permeantiles. In a uniform
distribution between 0 and 1, the 25th permeantile would be 0.25. If you weight
the averages of each side 3 to 1 in favour of the smaller side of the
permeantile (0 to 0.25), and average these, then you get 0.25. (3*0.125 +
1*0.625) / 4 = 0.25. So for the 10th permeantile, you have (9*0.05 + 1*0.55) /
10 = 0.1 and so on. I imagine this would work for non-uniform distributions too.
(Sorry for going off topic.)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/attachments/20110709/20205cdd/attachment-0004.htm>
More information about the Election-Methods
mailing list