[EM] Statistical analysis of Voter Models versus real life voting
Leon Smith
leon.p.smith at gmail.com
Sat Jan 29 05:52:41 PST 2011
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 3:08 PM, Kristofer Munsterhjelm
<km-elmet at broadpark.no> wrote:
> One could generalize Yee diagrams to other distances than Euclidean, but
> AFAIK, there's a theorem that says that with any centrosymmetric
> distribution, the Yee diagram for a Condorcet method is the L2 Voronoi
> diagram. Warren used this to argue that Range is better than Condorcet
> because it would make more sense for voters with L1 (Manhattan distance)
> utility functions to yield L1 win regions (which Range does) and not L2
> (Euclidean) win regions, as Condorcet methods do.
Interesting, but wouldn't you need slightly more stringent conditions
than "merely" a centrosymmetric voter distribution? For example,
consider four identical gaussian distributions added together, with
the peaks placed at four corners of a square. Then place four
candidates, one at each peak, and rotate the candidates around the
center of the square by 20 degrees or so. Now you have a
centrosymmetric voter distribution and a condorcet paradox. If your
condorcet method resorts to IRV to resolve the ambiguity, for
example, you certainly won't get a Voroni diagram. (And I presume
some of the other Condorcet methods would exibit the same behavior.)
>> Given access to enough data of fully-ranked, it seems to me that it
>> should be possible, especially with a Yee model, to somehow
>> determine how well that model fits real life. Is a 2-d euclidean
>> plane a with voters ranking based on distance from the candidates a
>> reasonable model? How would you analyze this?
>
> You may want to check Tideman's paper "The Structure of the
> Election-Generating Universe". See
> http://www2.lse.ac.uk/CPNSS/projects/VPP/VPPpdf/VPPpdf_Wshop2010/Workshop%20Papers/duBaffy2010_Plassmann.pdf
> . The paper suggests that a spatial model is the most accurate given the
> election data examined.
That paper looks interesting and very relevant, thanks! I haven't
examined the other links too much yet.
- Leon
More information about the Election-Methods
mailing list