[EM] A completely idiotic Instant Runoff Voting (IRV) election

[C.Benham]

C.Benham wrote:

>>/ Score voting <http://rangevoting.org/RangeVoting.html> considers this 
/>>/ election an easy call. It would elect B if all voters gave score X to 
/>>/ their first choice, Y to their second,
/>>/ and Z to their third, for /any/ X?Y?Z, not all equal.
/>/ 
/>/ Really?
/>/ 
/>/ 18: A9,  B1,  C0
/>/ 24: B9,  C1,  A0
/>/ 15: C9,  A8,  B0
/>/ 
/>/ A wins. Doesn't this example qualify?


/
Kristofer M. wrote:

>I don't think so. For the first two ballot groups, you have X = 9, Y = 
>1, Z = 0, but then you change them to X = 9, Y = 8, Z = 0 for the last.
>  
>

So what does the phrase  "not all equal" refer to then?

Chris Benham


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/attachments/20100903/e15af73b/attachment-0004.htm>