[EM] Schulze Method (Markus Schulze)
kathy.dopp at gmail.com
Sun Sep 19 12:40:49 PDT 2010
Unfortunately I don't have time to study it now, but a quick perusal
makes it seem written in a clear, easily-understood style of writing.
Am I to assume that this method solves the problem of irrelevant
alternatives (the spoiler problem) in all cases unlike both plurality
I do not know what "clone-independent" means (perhaps I should by now).
> Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2010 22:27:07 +0200
> From: Markus Schulze <markus.schulze at alumni.tu-berlin.de>
> To: election-methods at electorama.com
> Subject: [EM] Schulze Method
> Message-ID: <18.104.22.168.1.20100918222504.06bd6138 at alumni.tu-berlin.de>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> I have uploaded a new version of my paper
> "A New Monotonic, Clone-Independent, ...":
> I have shortened my paper from 167 pages
> to 64 pages. The new version is simpler
> and more stringent than the old version
> (because, in the new version, I use one
> and only one heuristic for the Schulze
> method). The proofs are simpler because
> I moved the random ballot tie-breaker
> from section 2 to section 5.
> Markus Schulze
Town of Colonie, NY 12304
"One of the best ways to keep any conversation civil is to support the
discussion with true facts."
Fundamentals of Verifiable Elections
Realities Mar Instant Runoff Voting
View some of my research on my SSRN Author page:
More information about the Election-Methods