[EM] piling on against IRV

[robert bristow-johnson]

On May 6, 2010, at 7:05 PM, robert bristow-johnson wrote:


> none of us (including the reactionaries who like FPTP and the two- 
> party system) agree about what a "simple majority" means in a two- 
> candidate race.  between any two candidates, there is always a  
> majority, unless they tie.  i would begin with that meaning and, if  
> at all possible, hold onto that in any election method.

sorry, another "Wicked Bible" typo.  i meant to say that "none of us  
(including the reactionaries who like FPTP and the two-party system)  
DISagree about what a "simple majority" means in a two-candidate race."

--

r b-j                  rbj at audioimagination.com

"Imagination is more important than knowledge."