[EM] Proportionality-preference tradeoffs
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
km-elmet at broadpark.no
Mon Mar 22 15:22:52 PDT 2010
After reading the post on measuring multiwinner goodness (and writing a
reply to it), I started to think of how to determine how good the
different multiwinner methods actually are.
One way to do that is by criterion compliance. But there is another:
while proportionality can't be expressed in terms of majoritarian
quality (preference), we can still determine the Pareto front, given a
way to measure proportionality and preference.
There are many ways to do so - I have chosen one combination (normalized
Sainte-Lague index and Bayesian regret). The results are here:
http://munsterhjelm.no/km/elections/multiwinner_tradeoffs/
May it be of interest! :-)
More information about the Election-Methods
mailing list