[EM] IRV vs Plurality (Dave Ketchum) (Kathy Dopp)
Kathy Dopp
kathy.dopp at gmail.com
Sat Jan 16 12:41:34 PST 2010
> Message: 2
> Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2010 15:14:23 -0500
> From: robert bristow-johnson <rbj at audioimagination.com>
> To: EM Methods <election-methods at lists.electorama.com>
> Subject: Re: [EM] IRV vs Plurality (Dave Ketchum)
>>
>> Don't know what you're talking about.
>
> consider Burlington 2009 with the inconsequential candidates Simpson
> and "write-in" eliminated and very real (but otherwise last)
> candidate Dan Smith eliminated. that least Wright, Montroll, and
> Kiss. with only those three left, these are the pile counts of the
> only salient permutations of marked ballots:
>
> 1332 M>K>W
> 767 M>W>K
> 455 M
> 2043 K>M>W
> 371 K>W>M
> 568 K
> 1513 W>M>K
> 495 W>K>M
> 1289 W
>
> now, Kathy, ask yourself why there are no piles marked just M>K or
> M>W or K>M or K>W or W>M or W>K? (those are the 6 piles you want to
> enumerate in your 15.)
Robert, Your slip is showing again.
Exactly as I tried to point out to you, you were either disallowing
voters to rank only two candidates or to rank all three. I see I was
correct and you are disallowing voters to rank only two candidates and
have, as Abd ul also pointed out to you, left 3 choose 2 or 6 possible
choices out of your list.
Unfortunately for your system of disallowing voters to rank only two
choices, US courts would rule that any such ballots where voters rank
only two choices as legal votes that must be counted, so you cannot
have a voting system in the US which disallows those choices.
>
>
>> All your formulas are incorrect.
>
> and, since you don't understand your opponent's argument, then your
> evaluation of it is authoritative.
Robert I just proved you wrong, as did Abd ul earlier. So please try
again if you think your other formula is correct, because
mathematically provably both your formulas are obviously incorrect to
any election methods expert on this list or any mathematician or
probabilist, not just to me.
Reality is a really nice place Robert. I invite you sincerely to join
us in the real world.
--
Kathy Dopp
Town of Colonie, NY 12304
phone 518-952-4030
cell 518-505-0220
http://utahcountvotes.org
http://electionmathematics.org
http://kathydopp.com/serendipity/
Realities Mar Instant Runoff Voting
http://electionmathematics.org/ucvAnalysis/US/RCV-IRV/InstantRunoffVotingFlaws.pdf
Voters Have Reason to Worry
http://utahcountvotes.org/UT/UtahCountVotes-ThadHall-Response.pdf
Checking election outcome accuracy --- Post-election audit sampling
http://electionmathematics.org/em-audits/US/PEAuditSamplingMethods.pdf
More information about the Election-Methods
mailing list