[EM] Alex Small FBC paper
Warren Smith
warren.wds at gmail.com
Thu Aug 26 10:10:30 PDT 2010
>The idea of the linearity condition is simply that the statements being checked are all linear inequalities. In the very simplest case of plurality voting, candidate A would win if:
f(votes for A) - f(votes for B) > 0
AND
f(votes for A) - f(votes for C) > 0
AND
etc. for all other candidates
--a good name for that would be "polyhedral" voting methods.
I don't know why, since it seems to be an excellent concept -- and
you've shown it is useful -- but nobody (?) seems to have
discussed/named it before.
I was certainly aware (and probably many others too) that practically
everything was a polyhedral method, but few or no people ever actually
found a use for that observation before.
Well... actually I can think of some uses, but they were of a
quite different character. Numerous authors have used it to assess
probabilities of phenomena via polyhedral-volume computations, and
I've used it to find the "best/simplest" election examples of
phenomena by solving a linear program to find the example. You're
using it to make logical deductions to prove theorems.
>As for "*" vs. "x" for multiplication
--well, jeez, just use no symbol at all, AB = A*B, just like everybody else.
But if you insist on a symbol use cdot. (I do use * when forced to write in
un-typeset ASCII. But if you have a math typesetting program, why?)
>style...
--well, you're calling it style, but I think there is more to it than
that. There's good reasons for what you call style. What *I* would
label with the word style, is stuff for which there is NOT really good
reasons, and it really is more of a matter of personal choice. Like
use of the first person singular.
E.g. theorem statements ought to be self-contained standalone
readable. Definitions ought to be precise. This is not a mere matter
of style in my view. If they aren't then you're abusing the words;
they aren't real, it is just a sham.
--
Warren D. Smith
http://RangeVoting.org <-- add your endorsement (by clicking
"endorse" as 1st step)
and
math.temple.edu/~wds/homepage/works.html
More information about the Election-Methods
mailing list