[EM] Paper by Ron Rivest

[Markus Schulze]

Hallo,

Kristofer Munsterhjelm wrote (16 April 2010):

> I'm curious now as to how often, say, Ranked
> Pairs would disagree with GT/GTD/GTS. Do you
> consider the GT agreement a worthwhile metric,
> i.e. that (absent criteria problems) methods
> closer to GT are better?

I don't like probabilistic models, because I
don't think that voters are random variables.
However, I am impressed how often authors get
to the conclusion that the Schulze method is
the best method in random simulations.

Markus Schulze