[EM] the 'who' and the 'what' - trying again
Dave Ketchum
davek at clarityconnect.com
Sun Sep 28 22:27:50 PDT 2008
On Mon, 29 Sep 2008 03:24:37 +0100 Raph Frank wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 12:51 AM, Dave Ketchum <davek at clarityconnect.com> wrote:
>
>>>The idea of having a Condorcet party is to gradually transform Plurality
>>>elections into Condorcet elections.
>>
>>Disturbing existing elections by marrying in something from Condorcet seems
>>very destructive considering possible benefits, so how about:
>> Run a phantom Condorcet election with current candidates before the
>>existing voting.
>
>
> Right that is what I was thinking. It was that a party would hold a
> condorcet primary.
>
This phantom election would be run by the Condorcet promoters WITHOUT
marrying it in to the regular election - its purpose is to encourage
thought about Condorcet WITHOUT the thousand headaches that marriage would
produce. It would likely do better as a phantom election than as a phantom
primary.
>
>>Candidates can drop out if they choose:
>> Third party candidates have little to lose.
>> Major party candidates risk static as to why they did not dare.
>
>
> Also, I wonder if they could be put on the ballot anyway. Would that be legal?
>
Permitting dropouts is less destructive than demanding unwilling participation.
BTW - write-ins SHOULD be permitted, as would be in a proper election.
>
>>Those who choose to, vote via internet.
>
>
> This generates massive participation biases. You need some way to
> cancel them out.
>
Tolerating and admitting, without attempts at cancellation of bias, sounds
best to me - we are doing a demonstration rather than a true election.
Do need defense against one voter submitting multiple ballots - needs thought.
>
>>Thus we have ballots to count and report on as a sort of poll.
>
>
> The trick is to make it so that voters don't just see it as another poll.
We are getting voters to practice doing Condorcet voting - should matter
little that the results are a poll rather than claiming the right to be
counted as true electing.
--
davek at clarityconnect.com people.clarityconnect.com/webpages3/davek
Dave Ketchum 108 Halstead Ave, Owego, NY 13827-1708 607-687-5026
Do to no one what you would not want done to you.
If you want peace, work for justice.
More information about the Election-Methods
mailing list