[EM] About Condorcet//Approval (RF)
Dave Ketchum
davek at clarityconnect.com
Sat Oct 18 20:14:19 PDT 2008
On Sat, 18 Oct 2008 23:20:07 -0300 Diego Santos wrote:
>
> 2008/10/18 Dave Ketchum <davek at clarityconnect.com
> <mailto:davek at clarityconnect.com>>
>
> Given a Condorcet cycle, how does anyone justify awarding a winner
> outside?
>
> True that deciding the winner among cycle members can be a challenge.
>
> BUT, we know that every candidate outside the cycle has been voted
> as a loser to each member of the cycle.
>
> DWK
>
>
> Dave, I think approval winner outside Condorcet cycle is too rare in
> real elections.
>
So why permit it? I should not be the only one asking questions here.
Apologies - I did not pay enough attention when you started this, but now
get suspicious.
>
>
> On Sat, 18 Oct 2008 20:46:11 +0000 (GMT) Kevin Venzke wrote:
>
> Hi Raph,
>
> --- En date de : Sam 18.10.08, Raph Frank <raphfrk at gmail.com
> <mailto:raphfrk at gmail.com>> a écrit :
>
> On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 5:48 PM, Diego Santos
> <diego.renato at gmail.com <mailto:diego.renato at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Because Smith is more complex to explain, my current
>
>
> favorite election
>
> method is Condorcet//Approval. We don?t need
>
>
> complex algorithms to find a
>
> winner.
>
>
> What's the difference? The Copeland winner wins, and
> approval is used
> as the tie-break?
>
>
>
> The difference is that in C//A you do not have to be in the
> Smith set to
> win.
>
> Kevin Venzke
________________________________
> Diego Renato dos Santos
> Mestrando em Ciência da Computação
> COPIN - UFCG
--
davek at clarityconnect.com people.clarityconnect.com/webpages3/davek
Dave Ketchum 108 Halstead Ave, Owego, NY 13827-1708 607-687-5026
Do to no one what you would not want done to you.
If you want peace, work for justice.
More information about the Election-Methods
mailing list