[EM] About Condorcet//Approval (RF)
Dave Ketchum
davek at clarityconnect.com
Sat Oct 18 18:15:05 PDT 2008
Given a Condorcet cycle, how does anyone justify awarding a winner outside?
True that deciding the winner among cycle members can be a challenge.
BUT, we know that every candidate outside the cycle has been voted as a
loser to each member of the cycle.
DWK
On Sat, 18 Oct 2008 20:46:11 +0000 (GMT) Kevin Venzke wrote:
> Hi Raph,
>
> --- En date de : Sam 18.10.08, Raph Frank <raphfrk at gmail.com> a écrit :
>
>>On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 5:48 PM, Diego Santos
>><diego.renato at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Because Smith is more complex to explain, my current
>>
>>favorite election
>>
>>>method is Condorcet//Approval. We don't need
>>
>>complex algorithms to find a
>>
>>>winner.
>>
>>What's the difference? The Copeland winner wins, and
>>approval is used
>>as the tie-break?
>
>
> The difference is that in C//A you do not have to be in the Smith set to
> win.
>
> Kevin Venzke
--
davek at clarityconnect.com people.clarityconnect.com/webpages3/davek
Dave Ketchum 108 Halstead Ave, Owego, NY 13827-1708 607-687-5026
Do to no one what you would not want done to you.
If you want peace, work for justice.
More information about the Election-Methods
mailing list