[EM] Making a Bad Thing Worse
Dave Ketchum
davek at clarityconnect.com
Sat Oct 18 18:35:22 PDT 2008
On Sun, 19 Oct 2008 02:14:29 +0100 Raph Frank wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 1:44 AM, Dave Ketchum <davek at clarityconnect.com> wrote:
>
>>How do we measure 'sincere'? In most places in the US N backers place a
>>candidate on a party primary ballot, and N2 (usually a larger number)
>>directly on the general election ballot. Also voters can usually vote for
>>others via write-in. N and N2 NEED to be based on the number of potential
>>nominators and getting a 'reasonable' quantity of candidates.
>
>
> Maybe the best plan would be to say that the X candidates who receive
> the most signatures are placed on the ballot. There might also be a
> minimum number of signatures allowed.
I said to have X as a goal, but making it a rigid requirement has problems:
Can include candidates with unreasonably weak 'sincerity'.
Can exclude truly 'sincere' candidates (perhaps a limit somewhere,
but making N large enough can make excess candidates difficult).
Note that having ONE candidate for a primary is reasonable - even one
for a general election can be adequate, given one GOOD one.
>
> Probably the 2 major parties would be exempted (for practical reasons).
This makes no sense, though the N could, and probably should, be based on
party membership.
>
> Also, write-ins should be allowed.
--
davek at clarityconnect.com people.clarityconnect.com/webpages3/davek
Dave Ketchum 108 Halstead Ave, Owego, NY 13827-1708 607-687-5026
Do to no one what you would not want done to you.
If you want peace, work for justice.
More information about the Election-Methods
mailing list