[EM] RE : Re: When and how can we speak of "individual utility" and "social utility"?

[Kevin Venzke]

--- Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd at lomaxdesign.com> a écrit :
> While it is already true that Range and Approval *do* 
> satisfy that Criterion, in my opinion, on the argument that the 
> majority has consented to a different outcome,

"Majority criterion" has a specific meaning. It in effect says that a
majority can elect their first preference without concealing lower
preferences. You can hardly say that Range satisfies MF on the argument
that a majority could have concealed their lower preferences. That
would be like saying a product is free of charge to you because you can
choose not to buy it.

Kevin Venzke


	

	
		
___________________________________________________________________________ 
Découvrez une nouvelle façon d'obtenir des réponses à toutes vos questions ! 
Profitez des connaissances, des opinions et des expériences des internautes sur Yahoo! Questions/Réponses 
http://fr.answers.yahoo.com