[Election-Methods] RE : Re: Improved Approval Runoff

[Kevin Venzke]

Peter,

--- Peter Barath <peb at freemail.hu> a écrit :
> >By the way, electing from the Condorcet top tier using approval
> >would be called Smith//Approval or Schwartz//Approval depending on
> >which top tier is used. I don't typically consider these methods
> >because they are more complicated than Condorcet//Approval and
> >can't be adjusted to satisfy FBC.
> 
> And what about the method (I don't know the name) in which
> the least approved candidate is eliminated until there is
> a Condorcet-winner? Does it also fail FBC? Did somebody
> analyse the strategy incentives then?

That method fails FBC. But strict Condorcet compliance is probably 
incompatible with FBC.

I think that method has a good approach, though. Low approval is a good
measure of what is "noise."

> (And here I don't think of a method in which all ranked
> candidates are considered as approved, but a whole preference
> order with a cutoff mark somewhere between.)

I don't think this ends up making a lot of difference, as far as what
criteria can be satisfied.

Kevin Venzke


      _____________________________________________________________________________ 
Ne gardez plus qu'une seule adresse mail ! Copiez vos mails vers Yahoo! Mail