[EM] 3ballot - revolutionary new protocol for secure secret ballot elections

Warren Smith wds at math.temple.edu
Sat Sep 30 20:39:34 PDT 2006


>B.Olson:
>The down side is that since this directly accomplishes summation of the
>ratings, per-ballot-rating methods such as IRNR and raking-derivation to
>Borda or Condorcet/VRR are not possible [with 3ballot].

--well, whether this is a "down side" depends on your point of view.
I personally regard the fact 3-ballot works best with Approval & Range
as yet another argument in favor of those systems and against, e.g.
Plurality, Borda, Condorcet, & IRV  (in ascending order of strength
of this argument against them).

--PS.  Hey B.Olson, I saw your cool BetterPolls.com site.
I think it would be nicer if the user (poll creator) got to choose
the range.  You force -10 to +10, but some poll user might
prefer 0 to 99   or   1 to 1000   or whatever.
CRV attempts t give reasons to prefer 0-99,
   http://rangevoting.org/Why99.html

wds



More information about the Election-Methods mailing list