[EM] 3ballot - revolutionary new protocol for secure secret ballot elections
Warren Smith
wds at math.temple.edu
Sat Sep 30 20:39:34 PDT 2006
>B.Olson:
>The down side is that since this directly accomplishes summation of the
>ratings, per-ballot-rating methods such as IRNR and raking-derivation to
>Borda or Condorcet/VRR are not possible [with 3ballot].
--well, whether this is a "down side" depends on your point of view.
I personally regard the fact 3-ballot works best with Approval & Range
as yet another argument in favor of those systems and against, e.g.
Plurality, Borda, Condorcet, & IRV (in ascending order of strength
of this argument against them).
--PS. Hey B.Olson, I saw your cool BetterPolls.com site.
I think it would be nicer if the user (poll creator) got to choose
the range. You force -10 to +10, but some poll user might
prefer 0 to 99 or 1 to 1000 or whatever.
CRV attempts t give reasons to prefer 0-99,
http://rangevoting.org/Why99.html
wds
More information about the Election-Methods
mailing list