[EM] RE : [Fwd: Condorcet and the later-no-harm criterion]

[Kevin Venzke]

Dave,

--- Dave Ketchum <davek at clarityconnect.com> a écrit :
> As to "arbitrarily close", this example's 20% change would overbalance 
> such a change.

Suggesting that one candidate wins decisively in an "arbitrarily close"
scenario to the original one, is a way to avoid talking about giving
win odds to more than one candidate.

Kevin Venzke


	

	
		
___________________________________________________________________________ 
Yahoo! Mail réinvente le mail ! Découvrez le nouveau Yahoo! Mail et son interface révolutionnaire.
http://fr.mail.yahoo.com