[EM] RE : Re: simpler proof of "no conflict theorem" now trivial

[Kevin Venzke]

Hello,

--- Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd at lomaxdesign.com> a écrit :
> But 
> I've never seen anyone objecting that a method which only allows N 
> ranks in the presence of more than N candidates does not satisfy the 
> Criterion.

This has actually been discussed quite a bit. For example, in the past I
have advocated Condorcet methods run on three-slot ballots. I don't claim
that these methods satisfy the Condorcet criterion, however.

There are several approaches to defining criteria intended for fully
ranked methods, so that a method like FPP can't satisfy them on a
technicality.

Kevin Venzke
stepjak at yahoo.fr


	
 p5.vert.ukl.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Wed Aug 16 06:13:59 GMT 2006 
	
		
___________________________________________________________________________ 
Découvrez un nouveau moyen de poser toutes vos questions quelque soit le sujet ! 
Yahoo! Questions/Réponses pour partager vos connaissances, vos opinions et vos expériences. 
http://fr.answers.yahoo.com