[EM] Amnon Rubinstein's Proposal for Electoral Reform in Israel
daniel-j-bishop at neo.tamu.edu
Tue Apr 25 15:20:44 PDT 2006
Antonio Oneala wrote:
> */James Gilmour <jgilmour at globalnet.co.uk>/* wrote:
> > Antonio Oneala> Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 12:08 AM
> > I've never really been a fan of STV-PR. It's still a system
> > that's not independent of irrelevant alternatives, so in most
> > states it squeezes out third parties and moderates, unless
> > you expand the districts to an enormous size
> On what evidence do you base this assertion?
> Besides that fact that practically every country that has used STV
> has boiled down to a more or less two-party system?
> it will usually have a "center squeeze" effect, whereby moderates
> are eliminated first. There's fewer opportunities for strategic
> nomination than in SNTV, but still, a party can improve their outcome by
> running fewer candidates than there are seats, and vote-splitting.
> There's also the problem of non-monotonicity, and quite a few other
Couldn't the "center squeeze" effect could be removed by using
STV/Condorcet hybrids like CPO-STV
(http://wiki.electorama.com/wiki/CPO-STV) or STV-CLE
More information about the Election-Methods