[EM] election-methods Digest, Vol 22, Issue 23

[Doreen Dotan]

Excellent piece of work, Ka-Ping.  Kudos and thanks.
   
  Doreen
  
election-methods-request at electorama.com wrote:
  From: Ka-Ping Yee 
Subject: [EM] Visualizations of Plurality, Hare, Approval, and
Condorcet
To: election-methods at electorama.com
Message-ID: 

Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

Hi folks,

I'm new here and hope to learn from others on this list. Thank you
for indulging me with this request for feedback.

I did some simulations of Plurality, Approval, Hare, and Condorcet
methods (under certain simplifying assumptions) and produced
visualizations of the results, which are posted at:

http://zesty.ca/voting/

I'm curious what you all think of this. I was already skeptical of
the Hare method but the results surprised even me -- are they
surprising to you?


-- ?!ng






http://www.geocities.com/dordot2001/ImperativeOfMoralMaths.html
 

 

















		
---------------------------------
Love cheap thrills? Enjoy PC-to-Phone  calls to 30+ countries for just 2¢/min with Yahoo! Messenger with Voice.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/attachments/20060423/173288aa/attachment-0002.htm>