[EM] Re: Condorcet's strategy problem

[Abd ulRahman Lomax]

I wrote:

>And then (or perhaps as we see this approaching) we could proceed 
>with further reform. As I've stated before, there are better 
>methods; but when I have described one of them, it has happened that 
>my posts have been rejected as not being relevant to "Condorcet." 
>We'll see if this one gets through.....

Oops! I was confused. These subjects are under discussion on the 
Condorcet list, and I thought I was writing to that list. EM is not 
ordinarily moderated. Frankly, I think it is weird that the Condorcet 
list is. I understand the purpose, but there are better ways to 
accomplish it....

In fact, one of the posts that was rejected was really about just how 
to filter the noise, *without* creating a content czar. Odd, isn't 
it, that democratic reform movements so often reject democratic 
process as being impossibly inefficient?