[EM] Copeland, CDTT
stepjak at yahoo.fr
Tue Sep 13 13:34:22 PDT 2005
--- Jobst Heitzig <heitzig-j at web.de> a écrit :
> Does the CDTT have any other significance than the connection with Minimal Defense? In other
> words, what would you think of a method satisfying minimal defense but not CDTT?
I would rather let Markus discuss such issues as truncation resistance.
I was drawn to the CDTT because it satisfies minimal defense and is very easy
on Later-no-harm methods (in the sense that it does not force them to fail
Later-no-harm unless there are majority-strength cycles).
I am fine with methods that satisfy minimal defense but not CDTT. Especially,
because I don't believe CDTT is compatible with the favorite betrayal criterion
when there are more than three candidates.
Appel audio GRATUIT partout dans le monde avec le nouveau Yahoo! Messenger
Téléchargez cette version sur http://fr.messenger.yahoo.com
More information about the Election-Methods