[EM] correction about (& discussion of myths re) later-no-harm / nursery effect

[Chris Benham]

Warren Smith wrote:

>
>3. LNharm is deceptive: in IRV, voters *DO* have incentive sometimes (probably quite often)
>to truncate their ballots DESPITE the fact IRV obeys later-no-harm.
>That is because causing harm to your favorite, is not the same thing as
>causing harm to the expected election result.
>
>
>  
>
Warren,
Can you please give us an example of  this?



Chris Benham