[EM] All 3 methods thwart truncation too.

[MIKE OSSIPOFF]

The 3 methods that I discussed in my previous e-mail, when there are 3 
candidates, always thwart offensive truncation against the CW, when the CW 
has a majority against the candidate of the truncators.

Because of their SFC compliance, of course, wv and MDDA always have that 
property. Again, I can't guarantee it for DMC when there are more than 3 
candidates.

I don't know if I've  demonstrated that DMC fails SFC, or if I just assumed 
it because there's no obvious reason to expect it to meet SFC. It seems to 
me that if I'd used an example with more than 3 candidates to show that 
criterion failure, that is something I wouldn't forget.

Unless I've made error with the 3-candidate case, regarding DMC, an SFC 
failure example for DMC would need more than 3 candidates. That suggests 
that maybe there isn't one. I don't know.
Maybe DMC meets SFC.

Mike Ossipoff

_________________________________________________________________
Don’t just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search! 
http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/