[EM] It's just that IRV isn't a significant reform

Chris Benham chrisbenham at bigpond.com
Mon May 23 07:31:00 PDT 2005

You wrote (Sun.May22):

> Critics of IRV haven't said that IRV is evil. We've only said that IRV 
> isn't a significant reform or a significant improvement over Plurality.

The part after "We've only said that.." logically implies that either:

(1) "IRV  is  evil" , or

(2) "Plurality isn't evil, or is only slightly evil".

Let's just say that I was paraphrasing the clearly implied message.

Chris  Benham

More information about the Election-Methods mailing list