[EM] Paul doesn't understand something that I said

Paul Kislanko kislanko at airmail.net
Mon May 16 18:20:16 PDT 2005

What Mike doesn't understand is that messages whose sole point is to attack
another poster obscure whatever it is he's trying to say.

OK, Paul says "it is none of Mike's business what Paul didn't understand
that Mike wrote."

It was an observation that did not call for rebuttal.

Can we get a moderator? 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: election-methods-electorama.com-bounces at electorama.com 
> [mailto:election-methods-electorama.com-bounces at electorama.com
> Sent: Monday, May 16, 2005 8:10 PM
> To: election-methods at electorama.com
> Subject: [EM] Paul doesn't understand something that I said
> Paul said:
> It has been several months now since I've understood any of 
> Mike's rants.
> I reply:
> Paul forgot to let us know what, in particular, of the things 
> that I'd said, 
> he didn't understand. Of course Paul is invited to point out 
> any statement 
> of mine whose meaning isn't clear to him.
> Mike Ossipoff
> _________________________________________________________________
> On the road to retirement? Check out MSN Life Events for 
> advice on how to 
> get there! http://lifeevents.msn.com/category.aspx?cid=Retirement
> ----
> Election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em 
> for list info

More information about the Election-Methods mailing list