[EM] Re: Arrow's Theorem flawed?

Bart Ingles bartman at netgate.net
Thu May 12 22:51:18 PDT 2005

Paul Kislanko wrote:

> We weren't talking about that. We were discussing "election theorists found
> Arrow's proof flawed".

The term "flawed" is ambiguous, and could mean something other than 
"invalid".  Although I can imagine that the Wikipeople might have taken 
it that way.

More information about the Election-Methods mailing list