[EM] Percentage Support
Dave Ketchum
davek at clarityconnect.com
Tue May 3 22:59:57 PDT 2005
On Wed, 04 May 2005 04:50:30 +0000 MIKE OSSIPOFF wrote:
> Curt--
>
> You wrote:
>
> You cannot
> derive, from a Condorcet ballot collection, how much percentage support
> each candidate got. You can't give each candidate a share of 100% in a
> way that all candidates would agree on. If you can, I'd love to know
> how.
>
> I reply:
>
> For that purpose, report on the percentages of 1st choice support. The
> difference between that and the Plurality results percentages is that
> the Condorcet 1st choice votes are going to be a lot more sincere and
> meaningful than those of Plurality.
Agreed that Mike says it well.
Condorcet produces an array that I suggest would be valuable to learn to
mine for value.
Adding an extra row to that array for the first choices would be minimal
new pain, and give you a better view of voter preferences than Plurality
can know about.
>
> Mike Ossipoff
--
davek at clarityconnect.com people.clarityconnect.com/webpages3/davek
Dave Ketchum 108 Halstead Ave, Owego, NY 13827-1708 607-687-5026
Do to no one what you would not want done to you.
If you want peace, work for justice.
More information about the Election-Methods
mailing list